VELMAYIL ALIAS VELUMAYIL vs GOPINATH AND ONE ANOTHER — 260/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Disposed: Uncontested--Returned on 09th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080005212019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
536/2019
Filing Date
15-04-2019
Registration No
260/2019
Registration Date
22-04-2019
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Returned
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VELMAYIL ALIAS VELUMAYIL
Respondent(s)
GOPINATH AND ONE ANOTHER
THE ORIENTAL ONSURANCE CO LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 26-02-2026 | Orders | |
| 11-12-2025 | For further Proceedings | |
| 02-12-2025 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Kulithalai dismissed the claimant's petition seeking ₹10,00,000 compensation for a two-wheeler accident, finding that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the claimant failed to provide proper residential proof documents required under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166(2). The court ordered the petition to be returned and directed the claimant to file the application in the appropriate tribunal within two months, emphasizing that verified government-issued identity documents or sworn affidavits are mandatory to establish jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Kulithalai dismissed the claimant's petition seeking ₹10,00,000 compensation for a two-wheeler accident, finding that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the claimant failed to provide proper residential proof documents required under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166(2). The court ordered the petition to be returned and directed the claimant to file the application in the appropriate tribunal within two months, emphasizing that verified government-issued identity documents or sworn affidavits are mandatory to establish jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts