Ramasamy vs The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited,Trichy Advocate - N.MANOHARAN — 126/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080004612024
e-Filing Number
31-05-2024
Filing Number
432/2024
Filing Date
07-Jun-2024
Registration No
126/2024
Registration Date
03-Jul-2024
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramasamy
Adv. S.Gajini Mohamed
-
2.Gowri
Adv. Gajini Mohamed S
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited,Trichy Advocate - N.MANOHARAN
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
This is a witness examination record from the Subordinate Court, Cuddalore (MCOP.NO. 126/2024) dated March 10, 2026, under Section 44/1969. The witness (Kaliyapurumals) testified and confirmed the authenticity of their Aadhar card photocopy (marked as M.SA.A.15) as evidence. The court recorded the witness statement without cross-examination, and the petition was decided based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Counter
Sub Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Counter
Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Counter
Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Counter
Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Counter
Sub Judge
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2024
This is a witness examination record from the Subordinate Court, Cuddalore (MCOP.NO. 126/2024) dated March 10, 2026, under Section 44/1969. The witness (Kaliyapurumals) testified and confirmed the authenticity of their Aadhar card photocopy (marked as M.SA.A.15) as evidence. The court recorded the witness statement without cross-examination, and the petition was decided based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts