S.SANTHI vs M.PAPPAMMAL AND 10 OTHERS — 1200153/2016
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 714. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR080004282016
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1200153/2016
Filing Date
06-09-2016
Registration No
1200153/2016
Registration Date
06-09-2016
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.SANTHI
Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT
Respondent(s)
M.PAPPAMMAL AND 10 OTHERS
M.MUTHU
M.SEENIVASAN
M.GOPAL
M.MARUTHAI
Adv. GOWTHAM
M.VADIVEL
P.DANAM
V.ARUMUGAM
V.PAZHANISAMY
V.MURUGAN
V.KRISHANAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: OS.No.153/2016, Koovilthali Subordinate Court Date: 30.03.2026 This is a cross-examination order in a property dispute involving contested documents dated 12.02.1974 and a police complaint receipt from 15.10.2013. The court examined the plaintiff's statements regarding property documents, inheritance claims, and allegations of forged will documents. The judge recorded statements from both the fifth defendant and plaintiff regarding the authenticity of documents and related proceedings (CC 208/2011) but did not render a final judgment in this order—rather, it documents the examination proceedings and the parties' respective positions on evidence and procedural matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: OS.No.153/2016, Koovilthali Subordinate Court Date: 30.03.2026 This is a cross-examination order in a property dispute involving contested documents dated 12.02.1974 and a police complaint receipt from 15.10.2013. The court examined the plaintiff's statements regarding property documents, inheritance claims, and allegations of forged will documents. The judge recorded statements from both the fifth defendant and plaintiff regarding the authenticity of documents and related proceedings (CC 208/2011) but did not render a final judgment in this order—rather, it documents the examination proceedings and the parties' respective positions on evidence and procedural matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts