M.NAGAKANNI vs M.PAPPATHI AND OTHERS — 55/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR080004122019
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
422/2019
Filing Date
27-03-2019
Registration No
55/2019
Registration Date
28-03-2019
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.NAGAKANNI
Adv. M.PARAMASIVAM
Respondent(s)
M.PAPPATHI AND OTHERS
M.MUTHAIAH
M.PRIYA
Adv. R.M.SENTHIL
S.MAHESHWAR
Adv. P.SARAVANAN
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KARUR
THE SUB REGISTRAR, KRISHNARAYAPURAM TALUK, KARUR DISTRICT
Adv. N.MANOHARAN
THE THASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KRISHNARAYAPURAM TALUK, DISTRICT
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KRISHNARAYAPURAM PERURATCHI ,KARUR DISTRICT
Adv. N.MANOHARAN
Shanthi
Karthick
Anitha
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Issue of Service
Await Notice
Await Notice
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 17-03-2026 | Await Notice | |
| 09-03-2026 | Await Notice | |
| 23-02-2026 | Amendment | |
| 19-01-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Subordinate Court, Kulithalai, allowed the interlocutory application (I.A. No. 8/2024 in O.S. No. 55/2019) filed on 17 April 2025. The petition to add the heirs of the deceased second respondent as necessary parties to the original partition suit was permitted. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of ₹1,000 to the third respondent by 5 June 2025, failing which the petition would be dismissed automatically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Subordinate Court, Kulithalai, allowed the interlocutory application (I.A. No. 8/2024 in O.S. No. 55/2019) filed on 17 April 2025. The petition to add the heirs of the deceased second respondent as necessary parties to the original partition suit was permitted. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of ₹1,000 to the third respondent by 5 June 2025, failing which the petition would be dismissed automatically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts