S.DHANALAKSHMI vs R.SRINIVASAN AND ONE ANOTHER — 158/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 141,166. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080003462023
Filing Number
359/2023
Filing Date
20-Mar-2023
Registration No
158/2023
Registration Date
19-Jun-2023
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.DHANALAKSHMI
Adv. K.SURESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.SRINIVASAN AND ONE ANOTHER
-
2.THE BRANCH MANAGER,NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,ERODE
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
Case Summary MCOP No. 158/2023 - Cuddalore Magistrate Court (dated 10.03.2026) This is a motor accident compensation petition where the plaintiff claims damages following a two-wheeler accident. The court found that the first defendant's vehicle driver was primarily at fault for violating traffic rules and driving recklessly, while the plaintiff and his brother exercised reasonable care. The court allowed the petition and awarded compensation to the plaintiff, holding the first defendant liable for damages while dismissing claims against the second defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Counter
Sub Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Counter
Sub Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Counter
Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2024
Counter
Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
Counter
Sub Judge
-
02-Sep-2023
Counter
Sub Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 158/2023
Case Summary MCOP No. 158/2023 - Cuddalore Magistrate Court (dated 10.03.2026) This is a motor accident compensation petition where the plaintiff claims damages following a two-wheeler accident. The court found that the first defendant's vehicle driver was primarily at fault for violating traffic rules and driving recklessly, while the plaintiff and his brother exercised reasonable care. The court allowed the petition and awarded compensation to the plaintiff, holding the first defendant liable for damages while dismissing claims against the second defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts