P.THANGAVEL AND ANOTHER vs S.PRABU AND ANOTHER — 1200302/2017

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163,166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR080003022017

Orders

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1200277/2017

Filing Date

18-09-2017

Registration No

1200302/2017

Registration Date

18-09-2017

Court

Sub Court, Kulithalai

Judge

12-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 163,166

Petitioner(s)

P.THANGAVEL AND ANOTHER

Adv. N.SENTHILKUMAR

T.PONNAMMAL

T.KALAIYARASAN

Respondent(s)

S.PRABU AND ANOTHER

THE MANAGER,M/S RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,TRICHY

Adv. A.NAAHARAJAN

M/S ULTRA READY MIX CONCRETE PRIVATE LIMITED, COIMBATORE

Adv. MAHESKUMAR

THE MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,COIMBATORE

Adv. A.ARASAKUMARAN

Hearing History

Judge: 12-Sub Judge

16-04-2026

Orders

26-03-2026

For further Proceedings

10-03-2026

Orders

24-02-2026

Arguments

17-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

This is a recorded witness testimony in a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.NO. 302/2017) before the Cuddalore Subordinate Court dated 24.02.2026. The witness, testifying on behalf of the second respondent, provided detailed cross-examination statements regarding a vehicle (TN 45 BF 1839), its occupants, and insurance coverage related to an accident. The court found the fourth respondent's dismissal petition to be without merit and recorded the witness's testimony accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a recorded witness testimony in a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.NO. 302/2017) before the Cuddalore Subordinate Court dated 24.02.2026. The witness, testifying on behalf of the second respondent, provided detailed cross-examination statements regarding a vehicle (TN 45 BF 1839), its occupants, and insurance coverage related to an accident. The court found the fourth respondent's dismissal petition to be without merit and recorded the witness's testimony accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case