M.MUTHU vs R.SURESHKUMAR AND ONE OTHER Advocate - A.SARDAR — 1200396/2015
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080001762015
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1200396/2015
Filing Date
11-09-2015
Registration No
1200396/2015
Registration Date
11-09-2015
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.MUTHU
Adv. B.SAMPATHKUMAR
Respondent(s)
R.SURESHKUMAR AND ONE OTHER Advocate - A.SARDAR
THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, KARUR
Adv. G.P
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KULITHALAI
Adv. G.P
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Steps
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Steps | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 20-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 13-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 02-09-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary In MCOP.NO. 396/2015, the Cuddalore Magistrate's Court examined an FIR (No. 379/2014) regarding a traffic accident. The investigating officer's final report concluded that the case was registered based on incorrect vehicle registration details and that the accident did not occur as initially reported—rather, a cyclist fell when swerving to avoid a bus. The court noted that the investigating officer who conducted the inquiry has since retired, and his examination would be necessary to clarify the facts of the case. No cross-examination was conducted by the complainant's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In MCOP.NO. 396/2015, the Cuddalore Magistrate's Court examined an FIR (No. 379/2014) regarding a traffic accident. The investigating officer's final report concluded that the case was registered based on incorrect vehicle registration details and that the accident did not occur as initially reported—rather, a cyclist fell when swerving to avoid a bus. The court noted that the investigating officer who conducted the inquiry has since retired, and his examination would be necessary to clarify the facts of the case. No cross-examination was conducted by the complainant's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts