VENKATARAMANA vs MAHINDRA KOLLIBOYINA AND ONE ANOTHER — 1200380/2014

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 167. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR080001612014

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1200380/2014

Filing Date

04-12-2014

Registration No

1200380/2014

Registration Date

04-12-2014

Court

Sub Court, Kulithalai

Judge

12-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 167

Petitioner(s)

VENKATARAMANA

Respondent(s)

MAHINDRA KOLLIBOYINA AND ONE ANOTHER

SRI RAM GENERAL INSRUANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

Hearing History

Judge: 12-Sub Judge

15-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

02-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

25-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

10-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

02-08-2019
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

This is a Tamil language court order (MCOP NO. 380/2014) from a District Court dated 02.08.2019. The case involves civil matters under the Indian Penal Code, 1969. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding allegations against respondent officials to be substantiated and ordered the respondents to pay compensation of 90 days' wages, while dismissing certain other claims as lacking sufficient evidence. The court directed implementation of the compensation order and closure of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil language court order (MCOP NO. 380/2014) from a District Court dated 02.08.2019. The case involves civil matters under the Indian Penal Code, 1969. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding allegations against respondent officials to be substantiated and ordered the respondents to pay compensation of 90 days' wages, while dismissing certain other claims as lacking sufficient evidence. The court directed implementation of the compensation order and closure of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case