V.SURESH vs S. RAMALINGAM AND ONE OTHER — 1200123/2015

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR080001242015

Evidence

Next Hearing

21st July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1200123/2015

Filing Date

20-03-2015

Registration No

1200123/2015

Registration Date

20-03-2015

Court

Sub Court, Kulithalai

Judge

12-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 140,166

Petitioner(s)

V.SURESH

Respondent(s)

S. RAMALINGAM AND ONE OTHER

THE MANAGER,UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,ERODE

Hearing History

Judge: 12-Sub Judge

23-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

27-01-2026

Evidence

13-11-2025

Await Reports

23-09-2025

Await Reports

Interim Orders

26-02-2021
Copy of Decree
02-01-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

SUMMARY In this motor accident compensation case (MCOP No. 123/2015) heard on 02.01.2025, the court examined testimony from both the petitioner and the second respondent regarding a vehicle collision. The petitioner provided documentary evidence including a first information report, medical bills, and a driver's license, while the second respondent disputed liability by presenting a detailed account of the accident circumstances. The petition was dismissed (मुद्दई विषाण - इल्लल), with the court finding insufficient grounds to award compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY In this motor accident compensation case (MCOP No. 123/2015) heard on 02.01.2025, the court examined testimony from both the petitioner and the second respondent regarding a vehicle collision. The petitioner provided documentary evidence including a first information report, medical bills, and a driver's license, while the second respondent disputed liability by presenting a detailed account of the accident circumstances. The petition was dismissed (मुद्दई विषाण - इल्लल), with the court finding insufficient grounds to award compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case