N.KANCHANA vs K. NATRAJAN AND ONE OTHER — 1200133/2015
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163,166. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080001182015
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1200133/2015
Filing Date
01-04-2015
Registration No
1200133/2015
Registration Date
01-04-2015
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.KANCHANA
Adv. N.SENTHILKUMAR
Respondent(s)
K. NATRAJAN AND ONE OTHER
THE MANAGER,UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,KULITHALAI
Adv. A.ARASAKUMARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
The court order (Case No. M.C.O.P.133/2015, dated 24.03.2021) pertains to a civil dispute involving property and inheritance matters. The court found that the first respondent's defendant had no valid claim and ruled in favor of the plaintiff/petitioner, while the second respondent was found to have suffered losses and is entitled to compensation. The court dismissed the defendant's contentions regarding sections 4 and 5 of the relevant act and directed proper documentation and evidence submission for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order (Case No. M.C.O.P.133/2015, dated 24.03.2021) pertains to a civil dispute involving property and inheritance matters. The court found that the first respondent's defendant had no valid claim and ruled in favor of the plaintiff/petitioner, while the second respondent was found to have suffered losses and is entitled to compensation. The court dismissed the defendant's contentions regarding sections 4 and 5 of the relevant act and directed proper documentation and evidence submission for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts