M.RAJESWARI vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TNSTC, MADURAI — 22/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Disposed: Uncontested--Returned on 10th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080000742019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
78/2019
Filing Date
08-01-2019
Registration No
22/2019
Registration Date
21-01-2019
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Returned
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.RAJESWARI
Adv. A.B.MEENAKSHISUNDARAM
Respondent(s)
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TNSTC, MADURAI
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Disposed
Orders
For further Proceedings
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | Orders | |
| 11-12-2025 | For further Proceedings | |
| 02-12-2025 | Await Reports | |
| 25-09-2025 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sub Judge at Kulithalai dismissed the motor vehicle compensation petition filed by Ramaswami against Tamil Nadu State Transport seeking ₹30 lakhs compensation for a 2017 accident, finding the court lacked jurisdiction. The claimant failed to produce documentary proof of residence within the court's jurisdiction as required by the Motor Vehicles Act Section 166(2), and without government identity documents or an affidavit confirming residency, the application could not be admitted. The petition was returned with directions for the claimant to file it in the appropriate competent court within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sub Judge at Kulithalai dismissed the motor vehicle compensation petition filed by Ramaswami against Tamil Nadu State Transport seeking ₹30 lakhs compensation for a 2017 accident, finding the court lacked jurisdiction. The claimant failed to produce documentary proof of residence within the court's jurisdiction as required by the Motor Vehicles Act Section 166(2), and without government identity documents or an affidavit confirming residency, the application could not be admitted. The petition was returned with directions for the claimant to file it in the appropriate competent court within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts