K.SIVAKAMI vs K.SHANMUGAM — 637/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR030016492024
Filing Number
1440/2024
Filing Date
06-Nov-2024
Registration No
637/2024
Registration Date
06-Dec-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Karur
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.SIVAKAMI
Adv. R.K.KARTHIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.K.SHANMUGAM
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
In O.S. No. 637/2024 before the Principal Sub Judge, Karur, the deposition of the plaintiff's witness (PW1), Sivakami, age 50, was recorded on 21.11.2025 under the Oaths Act 1969. The witness identified and authenticated five documentary exhibits including a sale deed (1994), partition document (1995), property document (1998), settlement deed (2007), and survey record (2024), which were marked as evidence in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 637/2024
In O.S. No. 637/2024 before the Principal Sub Judge, Karur, the deposition of the plaintiff's witness (PW1), Sivakami, age 50, was recorded on 21.11.2025 under the Oaths Act 1969. The witness identified and authenticated five documentary exhibits including a sale deed (1994), partition document (1995), property document (1998), settlement deed (2007), and survey record (2024), which were marked as evidence in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts