P.MUNIYAPPAN vs P.SHENBAGAVALLI Advocate - K.KOKILAVANI — 759/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR030016202022
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1510/2022
Filing Date
12-10-2022
Registration No
759/2022
Registration Date
12-10-2022
Court
Principal Sub Court, Karur
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.MUNIYAPPAN
Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN
Respondent(s)
P.SHENBAGAVALLI Advocate - K.KOKILAVANI
BLOCK LEVEL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER -1
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 11-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 05-12-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a witness deposition record (not a final judgment) from the Principal Sub Judge Court in Karur (O.S. No. 759/2022). The witness (PW1), a 67-year-old retired college professor, testified on 09.03.2026 regarding a loan dispute of ₹7,00,000 allegedly given to the defendant on 16.08.2020. The witness's cross-examination testimony detailed the loan transaction, supporting documents (promissory note, legal notices, property records), and responses to the defendant's lawyer's questions challenging the credibility of the loan and circumstances. The deposition is recorded but does not constitute a final verdict on the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a witness deposition record (not a final judgment) from the Principal Sub Judge Court in Karur (O.S. No. 759/2022). The witness (PW1), a 67-year-old retired college professor, testified on 09.03.2026 regarding a loan dispute of ₹7,00,000 allegedly given to the defendant on 16.08.2020. The witness's cross-examination testimony detailed the loan transaction, supporting documents (promissory note, legal notices, property records), and responses to the defendant's lawyer's questions challenging the credibility of the loan and circumstances. The deposition is recorded but does not constitute a final verdict on the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts