M.KANAGARAJ vs V.PONNUSAMY AND 2 OTHERS — 597/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR030013892021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1267/2021
Filing Date
06-09-2021
Registration No
597/2021
Registration Date
29-09-2021
Court
Principal Sub Court, Karur
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.KANAGARAJ
Adv. P.SARAVANAN
Respondent(s)
V.PONNUSAMY AND 2 OTHERS
THE THASILDHAR
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KARUR.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The Principal Sub Judge, Karur, concluded cross-examination of the plaintiff (Kanagaraj, age 66) in Original Suit 597/2021 regarding a dispute over a pathway to a temple in Thava village. The court found that the revenue department had already resolved the plaintiff's grievance regarding access through survey numbers 785/7 and 785/A16, and therefore the plaintiff cannot seek further relief against the defendants in the current proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sub Judge, Karur, concluded cross-examination of the plaintiff (Kanagaraj, age 66) in Original Suit 597/2021 regarding a dispute over a pathway to a temple in Thava village. The court found that the revenue department had already resolved the plaintiff's grievance regarding access through survey numbers 785/7 and 785/A16, and therefore the plaintiff cannot seek further relief against the defendants in the current proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts