SAKTHIVEL vs KARUPPANNA GOUNDER AND OTHERS Advocate - R.RAMANATHAN — 3000585/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR030011782018
Filing Number
3600565/2018
Filing Date
10-Jul-2018
Registration No
3000585/2018
Registration Date
10-Jul-2018
Court
Principal Sub Court, Karur
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAKTHIVEL
Adv. K.RAMESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.KARUPPANNA GOUNDER AND OTHERS Advocate - R.RAMANATHAN
-
2.LAKSHMI
Adv. S.VELMURUGAN
-
3.BANUMATHI
-
4.PAPPATHI
Adv. R.RAMANATHAN
-
5.DHINAKAR
Adv. P.PALANISAMY
-
6.RAMASAMY
-
7.SENTHIL
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Amendment
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Jun-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
Summary In Original Suit No. 585/2018 dated 27.11.2023, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the 4th defendant regarding disputed property ownership and settlement documents. The court found the defendant's testimony credible in establishing that certain properties were ancestral properties generating income used for subsequent property purchases, and that settlement documents executed by the plaintiff were valid and not binding on the defendant. The case is directed to proceed according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Nov-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Oct-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Sep-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Apr-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Apr-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
29-Mar-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
29-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
24-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Mar-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
08-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Mar-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Feb-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Dec-2022
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Dec-2022
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Oct-2022
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2022
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Aug-2022
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Jul-2022
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Jul-2022
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Jul-2022
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
05-Jul-2022
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Apr-2022
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Feb-2022
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Dec-2021
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Oct-2021
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Aug-2021
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Jun-2021
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Mar-2021
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Feb-2021
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Dec-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
25-Sep-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Jul-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Jun-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Mar-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Feb-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
23-Jan-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Jan-2020
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Dec-2019
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Oct-2019
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Oct-2019
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2019
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Jul-2019
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Jul-2019
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Apr-2019
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Mar-2019
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Feb-2019
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Dec-2018
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Nov-2018
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
23-Oct-2018
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Sep-2018
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2018
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Aug-2018
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 3000585/2018
Summary In Original Suit No. 585/2018 dated 27.11.2023, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the 4th defendant regarding disputed property ownership and settlement documents. The court found the defendant's testimony credible in establishing that certain properties were ancestral properties generating income used for subsequent property purchases, and that settlement documents executed by the plaintiff were valid and not binding on the defendant. The case is directed to proceed according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts