C.ANAANDHAN vs P.SUBRAMANI Advocate - PAZHA ANANTH — 300513/2017
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR030011402017
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
301090/2017
Filing Date
01-08-2017
Registration No
300513/2017
Registration Date
01-08-2017
Court
Principal Sub Court, Karur
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.ANAANDHAN
Adv. G.RAMESH
Respondent(s)
P.SUBRAMANI Advocate - PAZHA ANANTH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In Original Case No. 513/2017 (dated 13.02.2026), the Principal Sub Judge, Karur recorded the cross-examination of witness P. Subramanian (age 45). The witness was recalled to court and cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel was permitted. The court documented the witness's responses to various questions regarding his affidavit statements, including his knowledge of the defendant, employment details, and the authenticity of signatures on a promissory note. The court noted that the witness's statement was read back, confirmed, and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Original Case No. 513/2017 (dated 13.02.2026), the Principal Sub Judge, Karur recorded the cross-examination of witness P. Subramanian (age 45). The witness was recalled to court and cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel was permitted. The court documented the witness's responses to various questions regarding his affidavit statements, including his knowledge of the defendant, employment details, and the authenticity of signatures on a promissory note. The court noted that the witness's statement was read back, confirmed, and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts