N.KRISHNAMOORTHY AND 3 OTHERS vs N.MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER AND 2 OTHERS — 393/2021

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR030010732021

Evidence

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

980/2021

Filing Date

22-07-2021

Registration No

393/2021

Registration Date

22-07-2021

Court

Principal Sub Court, Karur

Judge

3-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7,R1
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 27(C)

Petitioner(s)

N.KRISHNAMOORTHY AND 3 OTHERS

Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN

K.PALANISWAMY

P.MUTHUSAMY

M.SARAVANAN

Respondent(s)

N.MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER AND 2 OTHERS

M.TAMILARASI@RANI

M.AARTHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge

15-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

Case Summary Original Case No. 393/2021, Principal Sub Judge, Karur | Date: 04.02.2026 In this land dispute case involving property boundaries and right-of-way issues, the court completed the cross-examination of the witness and ordered the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the disputed property (Survey No. 238/1 and related survey numbers) and file a detailed report. The court found merit in the plaintiff's arguments regarding encroachment and access rights, and directed further investigation through the commissioner's survey before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Original Case No. 393/2021, Principal Sub Judge, Karur | Date: 04.02.2026 In this land dispute case involving property boundaries and right-of-way issues, the court completed the cross-examination of the witness and ordered the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the disputed property (Survey No. 238/1 and related survey numbers) and file a detailed report. The court found merit in the plaintiff's arguments regarding encroachment and access rights, and directed further investigation through the commissioner's survey before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Karur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case