N.KRISHNAMOORTHY AND 3 OTHERS vs N.MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER AND 2 OTHERS — 393/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR030010732021
Filing Number
980/2021
Filing Date
22-Jul-2021
Registration No
393/2021
Registration Date
22-Jul-2021
Court
Principal Sub Court, Karur
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N.KRISHNAMOORTHY AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. K.SUBRAMANIAN
-
2.K.PALANISWAMY
-
3.P.MUTHUSAMY
-
4.M.SARAVANAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.N.MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER AND 2 OTHERS
-
2.M.TAMILARASI@RANI
-
3.M.AARTHI
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Original Case No. 393/2021, Principal Sub Judge, Karur | Date: 04.02.2026 In this land dispute case involving property boundaries and right-of-way issues, the court completed the cross-examination of the witness and ordered the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the disputed property (Survey No. 238/1 and related survey numbers) and file a detailed report. The court found merit in the plaintiff's arguments regarding encroachment and access rights, and directed further investigation through the commissioner's survey before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Jun-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Nov-2023
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Apr-2023
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2023
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Oct-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Jul-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Jul-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Jul-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Jun-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
23-Apr-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Apr-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Mar-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Jan-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Dec-2021
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Dec-2021
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Oct-2021
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
31-Aug-2021
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 393/2021
Case Summary Original Case No. 393/2021, Principal Sub Judge, Karur | Date: 04.02.2026 In this land dispute case involving property boundaries and right-of-way issues, the court completed the cross-examination of the witness and ordered the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the disputed property (Survey No. 238/1 and related survey numbers) and file a detailed report. The court found merit in the plaintiff's arguments regarding encroachment and access rights, and directed further investigation through the commissioner's survey before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts