N.BANUMATHI vs P.MUTHULAKSHMI AND ANOTHER — 181/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR030001902022
Filing Number
159/2022
Filing Date
04-Feb-2022
Registration No
181/2022
Registration Date
09-Mar-2022
Court
Principal Sub Court, Karur
Judge
3-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N.BANUMATHI
Adv. S.SELVARAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.P.MUTHULAKSHMI AND ANOTHER
-
2.P.SANTHANAMMAL
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Stay
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Stay
Principal Sub Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Stay
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Stay
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Stay
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Stay
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Stay
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
Case Summary O.S. 181/2022 | Dated: 02.09.2024 | Karur District Court The court examined a property dispute involving 4.40 acres and 2.20 cents of land. The judgment addresses cross-examination of the defendant (respondent 1) regarding partition of property and documents (Exs. 9 and 10 from 2021). The court found certain factual assertions regarding the defendants' age (approximately 80 years) and lack of writing ability by specific individuals to be correct, while rejecting other contentions about document non-receipt and dissolution of the case. The order was signed by the presiding judge after being read out and confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
14-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
29-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Apr-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Feb-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Jan-2024
Trial
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Nov-2023
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
31-Mar-2023
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Dec-2022
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 181/2022
Case Summary O.S. 181/2022 | Dated: 02.09.2024 | Karur District Court The court examined a property dispute involving 4.40 acres and 2.20 cents of land. The judgment addresses cross-examination of the defendant (respondent 1) regarding partition of property and documents (Exs. 9 and 10 from 2021). The court found certain factual assertions regarding the defendants' age (approximately 80 years) and lack of writing ability by specific individuals to be correct, while rejecting other contentions about document non-receipt and dissolution of the case. The order was signed by the presiding judge after being read out and confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts