THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, KARUR. vs G.RAJESHKANNA (KUMAR) AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.PANDIAN — 854/2023

Case under Tn Scheduled Commodities [ Rdcs ] Order, 1982 Section 6(4). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR020125042023

Filing Number

10983/2023

Filing Date

10-Oct-2023

Registration No

854/2023

Registration Date

10-Oct-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Scheduled Commodities [ Rdcs ] Order, 1982 Section 6(4)
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Section 7(1)(a)(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, KARUR.

    Adv. APP GRADE II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G.RAJESHKANNA (KUMAR) AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.PANDIAN

  2. 2.G.THIYAGARAJAN

    Adv. M.MOHAMAD ISMAIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court at Karur acquitted accused persons Rajeshkanna (A2) and Thiyagarajan (A4) under the Tamil Nadu Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on the grounds that the prosecution failed to conclusively establish their culpability beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence linking A2 and A4 to the illegal transportation of government-distributed ration rice (22,850 kg of rice worth ₹3,05,933), while earlier accused A1 and A3 had been separately convicted in a prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  14. 22-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  17. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  18. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  19. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  20. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  21. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  22. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  23. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  24. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  25. 24-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  26. 23-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  27. 22-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  28. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  29. 24-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  30. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  31. 06-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  32. 24-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  33. 30-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  34. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  35. 10-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 10-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 854/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court at Karur acquitted accused persons Rajeshkanna (A2) and Thiyagarajan (A4) under the Tamil Nadu Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on the grounds that the prosecution failed to conclusively establish their culpability beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence linking A2 and A4 to the illegal transportation of government-distributed ration rice (22,850 kg of rice worth ₹3,05,933), while earlier accused A1 and A3 had been separately convicted in a prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case