THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, KARUR. vs G.RAJESHKANNA (KUMAR) AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.PANDIAN — 854/2023
Case under Tn Scheduled Commodities [ Rdcs ] Order, 1982 Section 6(4). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR020125042023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10983/2023
Filing Date
10-10-2023
Registration No
854/2023
Registration Date
10-10-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, KARUR.
Adv. APP GRADE II
Respondent(s)
G.RAJESHKANNA (KUMAR) AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.PANDIAN
G.THIYAGARAJAN
Adv. M.MOHAMAD ISMAIL
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 03-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court at Karur acquitted accused persons Rajeshkanna (A2) and Thiyagarajan (A4) under the Tamil Nadu Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on the grounds that the prosecution failed to conclusively establish their culpability beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence linking A2 and A4 to the illegal transportation of government-distributed ration rice (22,850 kg of rice worth ₹3,05,933), while earlier accused A1 and A3 had been separately convicted in a prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court at Karur acquitted accused persons Rajeshkanna (A2) and Thiyagarajan (A4) under the Tamil Nadu Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on the grounds that the prosecution failed to conclusively establish their culpability beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence linking A2 and A4 to the illegal transportation of government-distributed ration rice (22,850 kg of rice worth ₹3,05,933), while earlier accused A1 and A3 had been separately convicted in a prior case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts