SUB INSPECTOR OF THANTHONIMALAI P.S. vs K.BALASUBRAMANI — 567/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),379,427,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR020121582023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10664/2023
Filing Date
14-09-2023
Registration No
567/2025
Registration Date
26-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
326
Police Station
Thanthonimalai P.s
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSPECTOR OF THANTHONIMALAI P.S.
Adv. APP GRADE
Respondent(s)
K.BALASUBRAMANI
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 02-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Karur Criminal Court acquitted the accused Balsubramaniam on March 9, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 294(b), 379, 427, and 506(ii) beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant (witness) had no direct knowledge of the incident, and while investigating officer's evidence supported the charges, the lack of corroborating eyewitness testimony created reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1), and seized property was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Karur Criminal Court acquitted the accused Balsubramaniam on March 9, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC sections 294(b), 379, 427, and 506(ii) beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant (witness) had no direct knowledge of the incident, and while investigating officer's evidence supported the charges, the lack of corroborating eyewitness testimony created reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1), and seized property was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts