M.SIVAKUMAR MANI vs SRI THIRUMAL EXPORTS, D.CHITRA — 3304/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Questioning Next hearing 15-May-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNKR020112022023

Filing Number

9879/2023

Filing Date

21-Aug-2023

Registration No

3304/2023

Registration Date

21-Aug-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No.II

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.SIVAKUMAR MANI

    Adv. S.RAJENDRAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI THIRUMAL EXPORTS, D.CHITRA

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  10. 23-Oct-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  12. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: STC No. 3304/2023, Dated 08.08.2025 Outcome: A petition under Section 317 (CrPC) was allowed. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding a loan dispute and settlement involving three companies. The plaintiff testified that he received a loan, a settlement was reached through mediation in March 2021 with a payment of Rs. 27 lakhs, and property in Rayyanur was transferred to him. The court found credibility issues in the plaintiff's version and rejected several of his claims regarding threats, coercion, and involvement with the three companies. The case was recorded and judgment pronounced based on the evidentiary examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  16. 23-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  17. 16-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  18. 29-May-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  19. 08-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  20. 13-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  21. 13-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  22. 07-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  23. 19-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  24. 24-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  25. 03-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  26. 05-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  27. 02-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  28. 09-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  29. 30-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  30. 15-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  31. 07-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  32. 30-May-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  33. 10-May-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  34. 25-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  35. 05-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  36. 15-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  37. 20-Feb-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  38. 20-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  39. 05-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  40. 20-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  41. 28-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  42. 03-Nov-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  43. 06-Oct-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  44. 08-Sep-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  45. 21-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 21-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3304/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: STC No. 3304/2023, Dated 08.08.2025 Outcome: A petition under Section 317 (CrPC) was allowed. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding a loan dispute and settlement involving three companies. The plaintiff testified that he received a loan, a settlement was reached through mediation in March 2021 with a payment of Rs. 27 lakhs, and property in Rayyanur was transferred to him. The court found credibility issues in the plaintiff's version and rejected several of his claims regarding threats, coercion, and involvement with the three companies. The case was recorded and judgment pronounced based on the evidentiary examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case