M.SIVAKUMAR MANI vs SRI THIRUMAL EXPORTS, D.CHITRA — 3304/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142,. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKR020112022023
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9879/2023
Filing Date
21-08-2023
Registration No
3304/2023
Registration Date
21-08-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.SIVAKUMAR MANI
Adv. S.RAJENDRAN
Respondent(s)
SRI THIRUMAL EXPORTS, D.CHITRA
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Questioning | |
| 06-04-2026 | Questioning | |
| 09-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 09-02-2026 | Questioning | |
| 12-01-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: STC No. 3304/2023, Dated 08.08.2025 Outcome: A petition under Section 317 (CrPC) was allowed. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding a loan dispute and settlement involving three companies. The plaintiff testified that he received a loan, a settlement was reached through mediation in March 2021 with a payment of Rs. 27 lakhs, and property in Rayyanur was transferred to him. The court found credibility issues in the plaintiff's version and rejected several of his claims regarding threats, coercion, and involvement with the three companies. The case was recorded and judgment pronounced based on the evidentiary examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: STC No. 3304/2023, Dated 08.08.2025 Outcome: A petition under Section 317 (CrPC) was allowed. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding a loan dispute and settlement involving three companies. The plaintiff testified that he received a loan, a settlement was reached through mediation in March 2021 with a payment of Rs. 27 lakhs, and property in Rayyanur was transferred to him. The court found credibility issues in the plaintiff's version and rejected several of his claims regarding threats, coercion, and involvement with the three companies. The case was recorded and judgment pronounced based on the evidentiary examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts