R.SADHASIVAM vs G.DEVARAJ — 2925/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKR020102232023
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9153/2023
Filing Date
07-08-2023
Registration No
2925/2023
Registration Date
07-08-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.SADHASIVAM
Adv. K.NATARAJAN
Respondent(s)
G.DEVARAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a civil suit court order from the Madras High Court (S.D.C. No. 2925/2023, dated 09.03.2026) in Tamil, concerning a contractual dispute over alleged loan and promissory notes. The case involves detailed witness testimonies regarding a claimed ₹30 lakh loan, disputed promissory notes, and conflicting accounts of the transaction's authenticity and documentation. Summary: The court heard cross-examination of witnesses in a civil case involving disputed loan documents and promissory notes between the parties; both witnesses provided contradictory testimony regarding the authenticity of the documents, the actual loan transaction, and related financial dealings, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a civil suit court order from the Madras High Court (S.D.C. No. 2925/2023, dated 09.03.2026) in Tamil, concerning a contractual dispute over alleged loan and promissory notes. The case involves detailed witness testimonies regarding a claimed ₹30 lakh loan, disputed promissory notes, and conflicting accounts of the transaction's authenticity and documentation. Summary: The court heard cross-examination of witnesses in a civil case involving disputed loan documents and promissory notes between the parties; both witnesses provided contradictory testimony regarding the authenticity of the documents, the actual loan transaction, and related financial dealings, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts