M/S SHREE SKANDAAGURU FINANCE REP BY MANAGING PARTNER P.SIVAMANI vs B.DINESHKUMAR — 2793/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKR020096582023
Filing Number
8701/2023
Filing Date
30-Mar-2022
Registration No
2793/2023
Registration Date
30-Mar-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S SHREE SKANDAAGURU FINANCE REP BY MANAGING PARTNER P.SIVAMANI
Adv. S.RAMESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.B.DINESHKUMAR
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
SUMMARY: In this case (S.D.C. No. 2793/2023) dated 10.04.2026, the court allowed a petition filed under Section 317 CrPC. The court examined the witness (complainant) who testified regarding a loan dispute and promissory note executed on 5.4.2019 between himself and the defendant for a finance business. No cross-examination was permitted, and the court found the case was improperly instituted based on forged documents and incomplete promissory notes, though acknowledging certain procedural irregularities in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
23-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
01-Sep-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
11-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
23-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
25-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
24-Feb-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
20-Jan-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
20-Nov-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
24-Oct-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
03-Oct-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
12-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
05-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
29-Aug-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
29-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
09-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
07-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
30-May-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
10-May-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
26-Apr-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
05-Apr-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
27-Mar-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
15-Mar-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
20-Feb-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
19-Jan-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
05-Jan-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
15-Dec-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
30-Nov-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
10-Nov-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
10-Nov-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
20-Oct-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
20-Sep-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.II
-
28-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 2793/2023
SUMMARY: In this case (S.D.C. No. 2793/2023) dated 10.04.2026, the court allowed a petition filed under Section 317 CrPC. The court examined the witness (complainant) who testified regarding a loan dispute and promissory note executed on 5.4.2019 between himself and the defendant for a finance business. No cross-examination was permitted, and the court found the case was improperly instituted based on forged documents and incomplete promissory notes, though acknowledging certain procedural irregularities in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts