K.SANTHOSH vs A.SUBBIAH NADAR H.P.PETROL PUMP, REP BY S.R.MURUGARAJAN AND ANOTHER Advocate - K.SUBRAMANIAN — 2650/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKR020091672023
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8348/2023
Filing Date
05-07-2022
Registration No
2650/2023
Registration Date
05-07-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.SANTHOSH
Adv. T.SATHEESHKUMAR
Respondent(s)
A.SUBBIAH NADAR H.P.PETROL PUMP, REP BY S.R.MURUGARAJAN AND ANOTHER Advocate - K.SUBRAMANIAN
R.MURUGARAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil case (STC 2650/2023) dated 09.02.2026 from Karur District Court involving a commercial dispute. The court examined testimonies from two defendants — Santhosh and Palakrishnan — who were cross-examined regarding alleged loan fraud and document forgery claims involving a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs and disputed promissory notes. Both defendants denied the allegations and contested the authenticity of the documents presented against them, with inconsistencies noted in their accounts regarding the proof notes and witnesses involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil case (STC 2650/2023) dated 09.02.2026 from Karur District Court involving a commercial dispute. The court examined testimonies from two defendants — Santhosh and Palakrishnan — who were cross-examined regarding alleged loan fraud and document forgery claims involving a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs and disputed promissory notes. Both defendants denied the allegations and contested the authenticity of the documents presented against them, with inconsistencies noted in their accounts regarding the proof notes and witnesses involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts