K.V.VISWANATHAN vs A.VANNIKUMAR — 2098/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant Next hearing 22-May-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNKR020077972023

Filing Number

7371/2023

Filing Date

20-Dec-2021

Registration No

2098/2023

Registration Date

20-Dec-2021

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No.II

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.V.VISWANATHAN

    Adv. N.PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A.VANNIKUMAR

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  10. 20-Aug-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  13. 04-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  14. 24-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  15. 08-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  16. 03-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  17. 12-Jun-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  18. 22-Apr-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  19. 08-Mar-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  20. 22-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  21. 15-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  22. 09-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  23. 02-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  24. 12-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  25. 15-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  26. 16-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  27. 27-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  28. 22-Sep-2023

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: STC. 2098/2023 | Date: 22.09.2023 The petition filed under Section 317 was allowed. The court examined witness PW1 (Viswanathan/Veeluswami) who gave sworn testimony; the court found the statements in the affidavit to be true. Cross-examination of the witness was postponed as per the defendant's counsel's request, and the witness was examined by the plaintiff's counsel and confirmed the documents presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  29. 22-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  30. 22-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  31. 16-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  32. 25-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  33. 12-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  34. 10-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 20-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2098/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: STC. 2098/2023 | Date: 22.09.2023 The petition filed under Section 317 was allowed. The court examined witness PW1 (Viswanathan/Veeluswami) who gave sworn testimony; the court found the statements in the affidavit to be true. Cross-examination of the witness was postponed as per the defendant's counsel's request, and the witness was examined by the plaintiff's counsel and confirmed the documents presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case