G.VIJAYA REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M.N.GOPALAN vs P.KUMAR Advocate - S.SIVAKUMAR — 1717/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKR020063442023
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6010/2023
Filing Date
29-05-2023
Registration No
1717/2023
Registration Date
29-05-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.VIJAYA REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M.N.GOPALAN
Adv. P.JEGANATHAN
Respondent(s)
P.KUMAR Advocate - S.SIVAKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
CMP Pending
CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-12-2025 | CMP Pending | |
| 24-11-2025 | CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: STC. 1717/2023 | Date: 17.08.2023 | Court: District Court, Karur Outcome: The petition filed under Section 317 CrPC was allowed. The court admitted the testimony of PW1 (M.N. Gopalakrishnan) on oath, and all documentary evidence (six exhibits including notarized power of attorney, mortgage deed, letter, check, lawyer's notice, and postal acknowledgment) was verified and accepted as authentic. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel was adjourned as per their request, and the witness affixed his signature before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: STC. 1717/2023 | Date: 17.08.2023 | Court: District Court, Karur Outcome: The petition filed under Section 317 CrPC was allowed. The court admitted the testimony of PW1 (M.N. Gopalakrishnan) on oath, and all documentary evidence (six exhibits including notarized power of attorney, mortgage deed, letter, check, lawyer's notice, and postal acknowledgment) was verified and accepted as authentic. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel was adjourned as per their request, and the witness affixed his signature before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts