C.NEELAKANDAN vs K.SUBRAMANIYAN — 1716/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKR020063422023
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6009/2023
Filing Date
10-01-2023
Registration No
1716/2023
Registration Date
10-01-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.NEELAKANDAN
Adv. P.JEGANATHAN
Respondent(s)
K.SUBRAMANIYAN
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 24-11-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case STC.1716/2023 (06.10.2023): Witness PW1 Neelakandan was re-called and examined on oath. His testimony regarding State Bank of India bank statements (dated 04.04.2019 - 27.03.2020) was recorded as true. Cross-examination was adjourned as per defense counsel's request, and the witness was directed to appear for further examination. Case STC.2286/2023 (24.08.2023): A petition under Section 317 CrPC was admitted. Witness PW2 Muthukumar was examined on oath regarding identity proof documents. His testimony was recorded, cross-examination was adjourned per defense counsel's request, and he was directed to appear for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case STC.1716/2023 (06.10.2023): Witness PW1 Neelakandan was re-called and examined on oath. His testimony regarding State Bank of India bank statements (dated 04.04.2019 - 27.03.2020) was recorded as true. Cross-examination was adjourned as per defense counsel's request, and the witness was directed to appear for further examination. Case STC.2286/2023 (24.08.2023): A petition under Section 317 CrPC was admitted. Witness PW2 Muthukumar was examined on oath regarding identity proof documents. His testimony was recorded, cross-examination was adjourned per defense counsel's request, and he was directed to appear for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts