S.LAVANYA REP. BY SAMINATHAN vs P.SAGAYAM AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - B.S.SARAVANESH — 1714/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant Next hearing 18-Apr-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNKR020063382023

Filing Number

6007/2023

Filing Date

10-Jan-2023

Registration No

1714/2023

Registration Date

10-Jan-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No.II

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.LAVANYA REP. BY SAMINATHAN

    Adv. R.RATHAKRISHNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.SAGAYAM AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - B.S.SARAVANESH

  2. 2.S.DHANABAL

  3. 3.JJ ENTERPRISES AND AGENCYREP. BY P.SAGAYAM

Case History

  1. 18-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  5. 30-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  7. 03-Oct-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  8. 12-Sep-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  9. 30-May-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  10. 21-Feb-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  11. 21-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  12. 19-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  13. 21-Jun-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  14. 27-Mar-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  15. 29-Feb-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  16. 08-Feb-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  17. 03-Feb-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  18. 24-Jan-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  19. 19-Jan-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  20. 29-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  21. 30-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  22. 04-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  23. 06-Oct-2023

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Case STC.1714/2023 | Date: 06.10.2023 Summary: The petition filed under Section 317 was admitted and allowed. The court examined witness PW1 (Rathamamurthy) who was sworn in and testified that the facts stated in the affidavit are true. Cross-examination of the witness was deferred as per the advocate's request, and the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 06-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  25. 19-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  26. 01-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  27. 25-Aug-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  28. 18-Aug-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  29. 07-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  30. 22-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  31. 29-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 10-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1714/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case STC.1714/2023 | Date: 06.10.2023 Summary: The petition filed under Section 317 was admitted and allowed. The court examined witness PW1 (Rathamamurthy) who was sworn in and testified that the facts stated in the affidavit are true. Cross-examination of the witness was deferred as per the advocate's request, and the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case