THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DCB, KARUR. vs C.YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGH (CHANDRABALI SINGH) Advocate - C.RAGUPATHY — 366/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 21-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR020059132023

Filing Number

5673/2023

Filing Date

18-May-2023

Registration No

366/2023

Registration Date

18-May-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

D.C.B. Karur

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DCB, KARUR.

    Adv. APP GRADE II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C.YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGH (CHANDRABALI SINGH) Advocate - C.RAGUPATHY

Case History

  1. 21-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) recorded on 29.12.2025 in Case C.C. No. 366/2023 at Karur Judicial Magistrate Court. The witness (Subramaniyan) testified regarding a financial dispute where he and his partner paid approximately ₹45.50 lakh to the accused for textile machinery that was never delivered. The court has deferred further proceedings to verify documentary evidence through Indian Evidence Act Section 65B and adjourned the examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  12. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  13. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  14. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  15. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  16. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  17. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  18. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  19. 31-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  20. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  21. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  23. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  24. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  25. 19-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  26. 22-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  27. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  28. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  29. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  30. 01-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  31. 09-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  32. 14-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  33. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  34. 13-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  35. 09-Jun-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  36. 26-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  37. 18-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 18-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 366/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) recorded on 29.12.2025 in Case C.C. No. 366/2023 at Karur Judicial Magistrate Court. The witness (Subramaniyan) testified regarding a financial dispute where he and his partner paid approximately ₹45.50 lakh to the accused for textile machinery that was never delivered. The court has deferred further proceedings to verify documentary evidence through Indian Evidence Act Section 65B and adjourned the examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case