Sub Inspector Of Police Thanthonimalai Ps vs Sivakumar Kishabai Advocate - N.VINOTHKUMAR — 368/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR020049542024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-06-2024

Filing Number

4118/2024

Filing Date

28-06-2024

Registration No

368/2024

Registration Date

03-07-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

239

Police Station

Pasupathipalayam P.S

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 379
MP/1/2025 Classification : Others Section Sub Inspector Of Police Thanthonimalai Ps
MP/2/2025 Classification : Others Section Sub Inspector Of Police Thanthonimalai Ps
MP/3/2025 Classification : 70 (2) Cr.PC Section Sub Inspector Of Police Thanthonimalai Ps
MP/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Sub Inspector Of Police Thanthonimalai Ps
MP/5/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Sub Inspector Of Police Thanthonimalai Ps

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police Thanthonimalai Ps (Police Station)

Adv. APP GR II

Respondent(s)

Sivakumar Kishabai Advocate - N.VINOTHKUMAR

Sarathi Bheema

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Judgement

05-03-2026

Questioning

02-03-2026

Questioning

25-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court (Karur) acquitted the two accused (A1 Sivakumar and A2 Sarathi) of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite four government witnesses being examined. The key evidence—an allegedly stolen Android phone (Samsung Galaxy A S 05)—lacked direct corroboration, and critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies, particularly regarding confessional statements and phone recovery details, created substantial reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court (Karur) acquitted the two accused (A1 Sivakumar and A2 Sarathi) of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite four government witnesses being examined. The key evidence—an allegedly stolen Android phone (Samsung Galaxy A S 05)—lacked direct corroboration, and critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies, particularly regarding confessional statements and phone recovery details, created substantial reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case