Natrayan vs Dharmaraj Advocate - EXPARTY — 265/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 10th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR020044332024
e-Filing Number
05-06-2024
Filing Number
172/2024
Filing Date
04-06-2024
Registration No
265/2024
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Natrayan
Adv. K.SURESH
Respondent(s)
Dharmaraj Advocate - EXPARTY
Chola Zone Ms General Insurance Company Ltd Rep By Its Manager
Adv. A.NAGARAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Orders
Await Reports
Await Reports
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 02-04-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 16-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karur awarded Rs. 12,81,675 to a 60-year-old petitioner who sustained 58% permanent disability in a two-wheeler accident caused by rash and negligent driving of an insured Swift Car. The tribunal determined the vehicle owner and insurance company (Solamandalam MS General Insurance) were jointly liable, finding the petitioner proved his case with medical evidence while the insurer failed to substantiate negligence claims; compensation was calculated using the multiplier method based on notional monthly income of Rs. 12,000 plus future prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karur awarded Rs. 12,81,675 to a 60-year-old petitioner who sustained 58% permanent disability in a two-wheeler accident caused by rash and negligent driving of an insured Swift Car. The tribunal determined the vehicle owner and insurance company (Solamandalam MS General Insurance) were jointly liable, finding the petitioner proved his case with medical evidence while the insurer failed to substantiate negligence claims; compensation was calculated using the multiplier method based on notional monthly income of Rs. 12,000 plus future prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts