Natrayan vs Dharmaraj Advocate - EXPARTY — 265/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR020044332024

e-Filing Number

05-06-2024

Filing Number

172/2024

Filing Date

04-Jun-2024

Registration No

265/2024

Registration Date

11-Jun-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Natrayan

    Adv. K.SURESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dharmaraj Advocate - EXPARTY

  2. 2.Chola Zone Ms General Insurance Company Ltd Rep By Its Manager

    Adv. A.NAGARAJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karur awarded Rs. 12,81,675 to a 60-year-old petitioner who sustained 58% permanent disability in a two-wheeler accident caused by rash and negligent driving of an insured Swift Car. The tribunal determined the vehicle owner and insurance company (Solamandalam MS General Insurance) were jointly liable, finding the petitioner proved his case with medical evidence while the insurer failed to substantiate negligence claims; compensation was calculated using the multiplier method based on notional monthly income of Rs. 12,000 plus future prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 22-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 01-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 13-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 29-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 11-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 25-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 10-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 16-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 18-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 25-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 04-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 09-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 04-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 04-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 03-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 08-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 13-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 04-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 265/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karur awarded Rs. 12,81,675 to a 60-year-old petitioner who sustained 58% permanent disability in a two-wheeler accident caused by rash and negligent driving of an insured Swift Car. The tribunal determined the vehicle owner and insurance company (Solamandalam MS General Insurance) were jointly liable, finding the petitioner proved his case with medical evidence while the insurer failed to substantiate negligence claims; compensation was calculated using the multiplier method based on notional monthly income of Rs. 12,000 plus future prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case