INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PASUPATHIPALAYAM PS vs RAHUL KUMAR AND MUKESH KUMAR — 266/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKR020017472026

Filing Number

1260/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

266/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

80

Police Station

Pasupathipalayam P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PASUPATHIPALAYAM PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL KUMAR AND MUKESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur granted bail to two accused persons (Ragul Kumar and Mukesh Kumar) on March 11, 2026, in a case registered under BNS sections 296(b), 115(1), 118(1), and 351(3) involving criminal intimidation and obscene conduct. The court imposed strict conditions including furnishing two sureties of ₹10,000 each, daily police reporting, cooperation with investigation, and mandatory court appearance, with warnings that violation would result in bail cancellation and proceedings under BNS section 269. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur granted bail to two accused persons (Ragul Kumar and Mukesh Kumar) on March 11, 2026, in a case registered under BNS sections 296(b), 115(1), 118(1), and 351(3) involving criminal intimidation and obscene conduct. The court imposed strict conditions including furnishing two sureties of ₹10,000 each, daily police reporting, cooperation with investigation, and mandatory court appearance, with warnings that violation would result in bail cancellation and proceedings under BNS section 269. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case