INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENGAMEDU PS vs VINOTH (STYLE PANDI) — 251/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKR020016832026

Filing Number

1199/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

251/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

248

Police Station

Vengamedu P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENGAMEDU PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINOTH (STYLE PANDI)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Karur District Court rejected bail for the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 251/2026, finding that granting bail would enable the accused to commit further crimes and intimidate witnesses, given that the case is still in evidence examination stage and multiple criminal cases are pending against the accused. The court ordered the accused's continued detention under PNSS Section 480, citing flight risk and the accused's history of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Karur District Court rejected bail for the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 251/2026, finding that granting bail would enable the accused to commit further crimes and intimidate witnesses, given that the case is still in evidence examination stage and multiple criminal cases are pending against the accused. The court ordered the accused's continued detention under PNSS Section 480, citing flight risk and the accused's history of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case