Inspector Of Police, Karur Town P.S vs V.MATHIYALAGAN — 240/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKR020016602026

Filing Number

1182/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

240/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

149

Police Station

Karur Town P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector Of Police, Karur Town P.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V.MATHIYALAGAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Karur, rejected bail for the accused (Madhiyalagan) in Criminal Petition No. 240/2026. The court found that the accused is charged under IPC Sections 406, 420, 468, 467, 471, and 120(b) (involving fraud and forgery), and noted risks of absconding, witness intimidation, and committing further crimes if released on bail. The petition was dismissed, and the accused was ordered to remain in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 240/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Karur, rejected bail for the accused (Madhiyalagan) in Criminal Petition No. 240/2026. The court found that the accused is charged under IPC Sections 406, 420, 468, 467, 471, and 120(b) (involving fraud and forgery), and noted risks of absconding, witness intimidation, and committing further crimes if released on bail. The petition was dismissed, and the accused was ordered to remain in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case