INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PASUPTHIPALAYAM PS vs MAARANADU — 239/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKR020016552026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1177/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
239/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
Pasupathipalayam P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PASUPTHIPALAYAM PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
MAARANADU
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 04-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 02-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Magistrate Court at Karur granted bail to the accused under Section 480 BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) in a criminal case registered under Section 303(2) BNS for alleged criminal intimidation. The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for 32 days since February 6, 2026, and determined that continued detention was unnecessary in the interest of justice. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including furnishing two sureties of ₹10,000 each, daily police reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, and mandatory court appearance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Magistrate Court at Karur granted bail to the accused under Section 480 BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) in a criminal case registered under Section 303(2) BNS for alleged criminal intimidation. The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for 32 days since February 6, 2026, and determined that continued detention was unnecessary in the interest of justice. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including furnishing two sureties of ₹10,000 each, daily police reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, and mandatory court appearance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts