INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENGAMEDU PS vs SETHUPATHI (SURYA) — 237/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKR020016532026

Filing Number

1175/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

237/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

248

Police Station

Vengamedu P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENGAMEDU PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SETHUPATHI (SURYA)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur denied bail to the accused Sonapathi (alias Surya) in Criminal Petition No. 237/2026 under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 351(3), and 309(2), citing concerns that the accused may abscond, commit similar offenses again, and intimidate witnesses if released on bail. The court found that the accused had multiple pending criminal cases and was allegedly a habitual offender, making him a flight risk and danger to the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur denied bail to the accused Sonapathi (alias Surya) in Criminal Petition No. 237/2026 under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 351(3), and 309(2), citing concerns that the accused may abscond, commit similar offenses again, and intimidate witnesses if released on bail. The court found that the accused had multiple pending criminal cases and was allegedly a habitual offender, making him a flight risk and danger to the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case