INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIYANAI,P.S., vs SENTHIL @ SENTHILKUMAR S/o.CHANDRAN Advocate - K.PARAMESWARI — 228/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKR020016322026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1154/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
228/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
Velliyanai P.S
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIYANAI,P.S.,
Adv. K.PARAMESWARI
Respondent(s)
SENTHIL @ SENTHILKUMAR S/o.CHANDRAN Advocate - K.PARAMESWARI
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II
Disposed
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 05-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 04-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 03-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court of Judicial Magistrate No. II, Karur granted bail to Senthil, accused under Section 392 IPC (robbery), considering his 12 days of custody, voluntary surrender, and legitimate reasons for earlier non-appearance following his surety's death. The bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to Abiraman Police Station at 10:00 AM, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court of Judicial Magistrate No. II, Karur granted bail to Senthil, accused under Section 392 IPC (robbery), considering his 12 days of custody, voluntary surrender, and legitimate reasons for earlier non-appearance following his surety's death. The bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to Abiraman Police Station at 10:00 AM, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts