INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIYANAI,P.S., vs SENTHIL @ SENTHILKUMAR S/o.CHANDRAN Advocate - K.PARAMESWARI — 228/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKR020016322026

Filing Number

1154/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No.II

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

Velliyanai P.S

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIYANAI,P.S.,

    Adv. K.PARAMESWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SENTHIL @ SENTHILKUMAR S/o.CHANDRAN Advocate - K.PARAMESWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Court of Judicial Magistrate No. II, Karur granted bail to Senthil, accused under Section 392 IPC (robbery), considering his 12 days of custody, voluntary surrender, and legitimate reasons for earlier non-appearance following his surety's death. The bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to Abiraman Police Station at 10:00 AM, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.II

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Judicial Magistrate No. II, Karur granted bail to Senthil, accused under Section 392 IPC (robbery), considering his 12 days of custody, voluntary surrender, and legitimate reasons for earlier non-appearance following his surety's death. The bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to Abiraman Police Station at 10:00 AM, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case