SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE KARUR TOWN PS vs M.ARJUNAN Advocate - N.RAJESH KUMAR — 251/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR020015862022
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1359/2022
Filing Date
19-07-2022
Registration No
251/2022
Registration Date
22-07-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
FIR Details
FIR Number
381
Police Station
Karur Town P.S
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE KARUR TOWN PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP GRADE II
Respondent(s)
M.ARJUNAN Advocate - N.RAJESH KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 251/2022 at Coimbatore Judicial Magistrate Court (dated 12.05.2025), the court examined the defendant's cross-examination testimony regarding a motor vehicle accident case. The defendant's testimony concerning his presence at the accident scene and lack of direct knowledge of the accused's liability was found inconsistent and unreliable. The court rejected the defendant's claims that he was not present at the location and found his initial statement inadmissible as evidence due to contradictions in his account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 251/2022 at Coimbatore Judicial Magistrate Court (dated 12.05.2025), the court examined the defendant's cross-examination testimony regarding a motor vehicle accident case. The defendant's testimony concerning his presence at the accident scene and lack of direct knowledge of the accused's liability was found inconsistent and unreliable. The court rejected the defendant's claims that he was not present at the location and found his initial statement inadmissible as evidence due to contradictions in his account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts