Selvi vs Shanthini — 40/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 07-May-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR020008572026

Filing Number

322/2026

Filing Date

26-Nov-2024

Registration No

40/2025

Registration Date

21-Jan-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvi

    Adv. S.SUDHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shanthini

  2. 2.The oriental Insurance Company ltd rep by manager coimbatore

    Adv. R.K.KARTHIK

Case History

  1. 07-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Karur recorded the deposition of witness Jothi (PW-1) on 08.04.2026 in case MCOP.NO. 88/2026. The witness affirmed her testimony and submitted nine documentary exhibits including reports, certificates, and correspondence related to embalming procedures and her son's educational records. The court recorded cross-examination by the opposing counsel and the witness acknowledged the accuracy of her recorded statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 40/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Karur recorded the deposition of witness Jothi (PW-1) on 08.04.2026 in case MCOP.NO. 88/2026. The witness affirmed her testimony and submitted nine documentary exhibits including reports, certificates, and correspondence related to embalming procedures and her son's educational records. The court recorded cross-examination by the opposing counsel and the witness acknowledged the accuracy of her recorded statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case