SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KARUR TOWN PS vs S.SURYAPRAKASH AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - K.KARTHIKEYAN — 200/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 387,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR020007862022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
591/2022
Filing Date
09-06-2022
Registration No
200/2022
Registration Date
09-06-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
865
Police Station
Karur Town P.S
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KARUR TOWN PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP GRADE II
Respondent(s)
S.SURYAPRAKASH AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - K.KARTHIKEYAN
G.MURUGAN
Adv. K.KARTHIKEYAN,K.KARTHIKEYAN
R.SRINIVASAN
Adv. K.KARTHIKEYAN,K.KARTHIKEYAN
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Karur Criminal Court acquitted three accused persons (Suryaprakash, Murukan, and Srinivasan) charged under IPC Sections 387 (extortion) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation) for an alleged dacoity and knife attack on July 24, 2020. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony contained inconsistencies and the investigating officer's evidence alone was insufficient to establish guilt. The court accordingly discharged the accused under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Karur Criminal Court acquitted three accused persons (Suryaprakash, Murukan, and Srinivasan) charged under IPC Sections 387 (extortion) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation) for an alleged dacoity and knife attack on July 24, 2020. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony contained inconsistencies and the investigating officer's evidence alone was insufficient to establish guilt. The court accordingly discharged the accused under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts