A.Thangavel vs Rajeshwari — 1930/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 154. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKR010040672025

Filing Number

2608/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

1930/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 154

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.Thangavel

    Adv. U.S.DHARMASENAN

  2. 2.A.Arjunan

  3. 3.Rangammal

    Adv. U.S.DHARMASENAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajeshwari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District and Sessions Judge at Karur allowed a petition seeking to condone a 43-day delay in filing an appeal against a domestic violence order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Although the petitioners failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay, the court granted condonation in the interest of justice to give the petitioners a fair opportunity to pursue their appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Judge

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Judge

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Judge

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  13. 27-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1930/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Judge at Karur allowed a petition seeking to condone a 43-day delay in filing an appeal against a domestic violence order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Although the petitioners failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay, the court granted condonation in the interest of justice to give the petitioners a fair opportunity to pursue their appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case