R.SAMPATH AND 2 OTHERS vs R.PALANISAMY AND 8 OTHERS — 317/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010039532023
Filing Number
1263/2023
Filing Date
11-Dec-2023
Registration No
317/2023
Registration Date
11-Dec-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R.SAMPATH AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. P.PREMKUMAR
-
2.S.AJAYKUMAR
-
3.S.SIVAPRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.PALANISAMY AND 8 OTHERS
-
2.P.VARSHINI
-
3.MINOR.P.LAKSHNA
-
4.P.PERIYASAMY
-
5.P.CHANDRASEKAR
-
6.P.KALAISELVI
-
7.M.KUPPUSAMY
-
8.M.MARAPPAN
-
9.P.MANOJ
Case History
-
04-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Trial
District Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Trial
District Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Trial
District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Trial
District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Trial
District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Trial
District Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Issues
District Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
Issues
District Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Issues
District Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
11-Dec-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 317/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed with no costs. R. Chandrasekaran, a third party, sought to be impleaded as the 10th defendant in an ongoing partition suit filed by R. Sampath and others against R. Palanisamy and others. The District Judge held that Chandrasekaran claims independent title to property in Patta No. 331, which neither plaintiffs nor defendants assert rights over. Since partition suits require joint rights/possession among parties, and the petitioner traces his claim independently, he is neither a necessary nor proper party. The court found that while he may have a title claim, such claims cannot be decided within a partition suit, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Dec-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
29-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
11-Sep-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
13-Aug-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
03-Aug-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Judge
-
24-Apr-2024
Written Statement
District Judge
-
27-Mar-2024
Written Statement
District Judge
-
27-Feb-2024
Written Statement
District Judge
-
30-Jan-2024
Written Statement
District Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 317/2023
Case Summary: O.S. No. 317/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed with no costs. R. Chandrasekaran, a third party, sought to be impleaded as the 10th defendant in an ongoing partition suit filed by R. Sampath and others against R. Palanisamy and others. The District Judge held that Chandrasekaran claims independent title to property in Patta No. 331, which neither plaintiffs nor defendants assert rights over. Since partition suits require joint rights/possession among parties, and the petitioner traces his claim independently, he is neither a necessary nor proper party. The court found that while he may have a title claim, such claims cannot be decided within a partition suit, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts