R.SUSILA AND 2 OTHERS vs P.SUBRAMANIAN AND 7 OTHERS — 313/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010038532023

Filing Number

1249/2023

Filing Date

05-Dec-2023

Registration No

313/2023

Registration Date

05-Dec-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.SUSILA AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. M.SELVAKUMAR

  2. 2.N.DHANALAKSHMI

  3. 3.R.ELANJIYAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.SUBRAMANIAN AND 7 OTHERS

  2. 2.V.AKILAMBAL

  3. 3.B.ANNAPOORANI

  4. 4.B.DHAMAYANTHI

  5. 5.S.INDIRAGANDHI

  6. 6.N.KRISHNAKUMAR

  7. 7.SENTHIL KUMAR TEXTILE MILLS PRIVATE LTD R.SENTHILKUMAR

  8. 8.AIKI ECO POWER LLP PARTNER P.NAMASIVAYAM

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Case No. 313/2023 dated 08.04.2026 from Karur District Court, the court recorded cross-examination of the first defendant (Susheela). The court found that on 23.08.2010, a property measuring 1 acre 88 cents was sold to the sixth defendant N. Krishnakumar, and that the sixth defendant has been operating a company on the property since 2010. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim that she would not receive compensation for the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Judge

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Additional Issues

    District Judge

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Judge

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Judge

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Additional Issues

    District Judge

  14. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 22-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  19. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  21. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  22. 24-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  23. 16-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  24. 12-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  25. 07-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  26. 19-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Judge

  27. 13-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Judge

  28. 29-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Judge

  29. 16-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  30. 15-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Judge

  31. 10-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  32. 14-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  33. 15-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  34. 11-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  35. 22-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  36. 16-Apr-2024

    Batta

    District Judge

  37. 27-Feb-2024

    Batta

    District Judge

  38. 23-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  39. 05-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 05-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case No. 313/2023 dated 08.04.2026 from Karur District Court, the court recorded cross-examination of the first defendant (Susheela). The court found that on 23.08.2010, a property measuring 1 acre 88 cents was sold to the sixth defendant N. Krishnakumar, and that the sixth defendant has been operating a company on the property since 2010. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim that she would not receive compensation for the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case