K.SATHYAVANI AND ANOTHER vs K.SAKTHIVEL AND 3 OTHERS — 287/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010035362023

Filing Number

1161/2023

Filing Date

07-Nov-2023

Registration No

287/2023

Registration Date

15-Nov-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.SATHYAVANI AND ANOTHER

    Adv. A.SURENTHRAN

  2. 2.P.NALLAMMAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.SAKTHIVEL AND 3 OTHERS

  2. 2.MINOR.S.SWETHA

  3. 3.MINOR.S.KARTHIKA

  4. 4.R.N.SIVA

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In this property succession case (A.V. No. 287/2023), the District Judge of Karur ruled that the plaintiff and defendant have equal shares in the disputed property. The court found that the property, originally inherited by Muthusami Kavundar, was divided orally among four heirs in 1984, and the plaintiff has been in possession for 30 years, establishing equal rights. The court ordered the defendant to transfer 1/12th of the property share to the plaintiff and dismissed the defendant's claims contesting the plaintiff's ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  16. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  18. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  20. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 24-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  24. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  25. 21-Nov-2025

    List / Special List

    District Judge

  26. 10-Nov-2025

    List / Special List

    District Judge

  27. 19-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  28. 18-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  29. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  30. 25-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  31. 12-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  32. 29-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  33. 17-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  34. 19-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  35. 16-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  36. 29-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  37. 26-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  38. 19-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  39. 10-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  40. 27-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  41. 23-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  42. 19-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  43. 15-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 07-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 287/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this property succession case (A.V. No. 287/2023), the District Judge of Karur ruled that the plaintiff and defendant have equal shares in the disputed property. The court found that the property, originally inherited by Muthusami Kavundar, was divided orally among four heirs in 1984, and the plaintiff has been in possession for 30 years, establishing equal rights. The court ordered the defendant to transfer 1/12th of the property share to the plaintiff and dismissed the defendant's claims contesting the plaintiff's ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case