Inspector Of Police, Pasupathipalayam Ps vs Hariharan — 74/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 3(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKR010034422024
e-Filing Number
03-02-2024
Filing Number
2046/2024
Filing Date
22-04-2024
Registration No
74/2024
Registration Date
18-11-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Pasupathipalayam P.S
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police, Pasupathipalayam Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Hariharan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Sessions Court in Karur acquitted S. Hariharan of all charges under IPC Section 294(b) (obscene language) and Tamil Nadu Public Property Act Section 3(1) (damage to public property), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness inconsistencies and the two seizure witnesses turning hostile. The court cited contradictions in witness testimonies regarding the manner of damage, discrepancies in the complaint details, and lack of corroborating evidence as reasons for acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The District & Sessions Court in Karur acquitted S. Hariharan of all charges under IPC Section 294(b) (obscene language) and Tamil Nadu Public Property Act Section 3(1) (damage to public property), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness inconsistencies and the two seizure witnesses turning hostile. The court cited contradictions in witness testimonies regarding the manner of damage, discrepancies in the complaint details, and lack of corroborating evidence as reasons for acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts