INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PASUPATHIPALAYAM PS vs DHINESHKUMAR(DHINESH) — 119/2025

Case under Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3(1). Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant Next hearing 18-Apr-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKR010034192025

e-Filing Number

17-06-2025

Filing Number

2254/2025

Filing Date

14-Jul-2025

Registration No

119/2025

Registration Date

06-Oct-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

399

Police Station

Pasupathipalayam P.S

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3(1)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PASUPATHIPALAYAM PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHINESHKUMAR(DHINESH)

Case History

  1. 18-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    District Judge

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    District Judge

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary In S.C.No.119/2025, the court heard witness PW3 (Vetriivel) on 06.03.2026 regarding Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.116/2026. The witness testified under oath and was cross-examined by the opposing counsel regarding discrepancies in his earlier statement about a bus journey from Trichy, but the court found his evidence admissible. The witness statement was recorded, read back to him, and he affirmed its accuracy before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  10. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 13-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  18. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 10-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  20. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  24. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  25. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  26. 07-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Judge

  27. 13-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  28. 12-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  29. 06-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 14-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In S.C.No.119/2025, the court heard witness PW3 (Vetriivel) on 06.03.2026 regarding Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.116/2026. The witness testified under oath and was cross-examined by the opposing counsel regarding discrepancies in his earlier statement about a bus journey from Trichy, but the court found his evidence admissible. The witness statement was recorded, read back to him, and he affirmed its accuracy before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case