R.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS vs V.MUNIYAPPAN AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - A.PANDIAN — 253/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010031012023
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1062/2023
Filing Date
03-10-2023
Registration No
253/2023
Registration Date
03-10-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. R.K.KARTHIK
K.NALLAMMAL
A.SAMPOORNAM
S.VEMBAYEE
Respondent(s)
V.MUNIYAPPAN AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - A.PANDIAN
M.BALAMMAL
Adv. A.PANDIAN
M.VISWANATHAN
Adv. A.PANDIAN
V.BHARATHI
Adv. A.PANDIAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 07-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Case No. 253/2023 dated 05.03.2026 from the Karur District Court, the court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to their share in the ancestral property as legal heirs. The court rejected certain disputed documents (Exhibits 4 and 6) as invalid, holding they were executed by the grandfather when he lacked sound mental capacity due to paralysis, thereby rendering them non-binding on the plaintiffs. The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs for recovery of their rightful share in the ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Case No. 253/2023 dated 05.03.2026 from the Karur District Court, the court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to their share in the ancestral property as legal heirs. The court rejected certain disputed documents (Exhibits 4 and 6) as invalid, holding they were executed by the grandfather when he lacked sound mental capacity due to paralysis, thereby rendering them non-binding on the plaintiffs. The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs for recovery of their rightful share in the ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts