R.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS vs V.MUNIYAPPAN AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - A.PANDIAN — 253/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010031012023

Filing Number

1062/2023

Filing Date

03-Oct-2023

Registration No

253/2023

Registration Date

03-Oct-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. R.K.KARTHIK

  2. 2.K.NALLAMMAL

  3. 3.A.SAMPOORNAM

  4. 4.S.VEMBAYEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V.MUNIYAPPAN AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - A.PANDIAN

  2. 2.M.BALAMMAL

    Adv. A.PANDIAN

  3. 3.M.VISWANATHAN

    Adv. A.PANDIAN

  4. 4.V.BHARATHI

    Adv. A.PANDIAN

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Case No. 253/2023 dated 05.03.2026 from the Karur District Court, the court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to their share in the ancestral property as legal heirs. The court rejected certain disputed documents (Exhibits 4 and 6) as invalid, holding they were executed by the grandfather when he lacked sound mental capacity due to paralysis, thereby rendering them non-binding on the plaintiffs. The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs for recovery of their rightful share in the ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  12. 03-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  13. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  18. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 08-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  20. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  24. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  25. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge

  26. 14-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  27. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  28. 16-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  29. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  30. 25-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  31. 12-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  32. 29-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  33. 17-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  34. 19-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  35. 16-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  36. 28-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  37. 25-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  38. 18-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  39. 24-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  40. 02-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  41. 28-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  42. 27-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  43. 22-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  44. 12-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  45. 07-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Judge

  46. 03-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 03-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case No. 253/2023 dated 05.03.2026 from the Karur District Court, the court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to their share in the ancestral property as legal heirs. The court rejected certain disputed documents (Exhibits 4 and 6) as invalid, holding they were executed by the grandfather when he lacked sound mental capacity due to paralysis, thereby rendering them non-binding on the plaintiffs. The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs for recovery of their rightful share in the ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case