P Ramasamy vs S Ganesan — 215/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374 (3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st June 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNKR010028232025
e-Filing Number
13-08-2025
Filing Number
1863/2025
Filing Date
13-Aug-2025
Registration No
215/2025
Registration Date
19-Aug-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P Ramasamy
Adv. Natarajan A
Respondent(s)
-
1.S Ganesan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: P Ramasamy v. S Ganesan (Criminal Appeal No. 215/2025) The District and Sessions Judge, Karur dismissed P. Ramasamy's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Ramasamy had issued a cheque for Rs. 8,50,000 to S. Ganesan that bounced due to insufficient funds; after receiving a statutory notice, he failed to pay or respond. The court found that Ramasamy admitted his signature on both the cheque and promissory note, failed to produce any supporting documents for his defense (claiming document misuse), and did not reply to the legal notice—all pointing to guilt. The trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence plus Rs. 8,50,000 compensation was upheld as justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 215/2025
Case Summary: P Ramasamy v. S Ganesan (Criminal Appeal No. 215/2025) The District and Sessions Judge, Karur dismissed P. Ramasamy's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Ramasamy had issued a cheque for Rs. 8,50,000 to S. Ganesan that bounced due to insufficient funds; after receiving a statutory notice, he failed to pay or respond. The court found that Ramasamy admitted his signature on both the cheque and promissory note, failed to produce any supporting documents for his defense (claiming document misuse), and did not reply to the legal notice—all pointing to guilt. The trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence plus Rs. 8,50,000 compensation was upheld as justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts