S.CHELLAMMAL vs K.NAKULSAMY AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - T.RAVIKUMAR — 215/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR010026662023

Judgement

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

910/2023

Filing Date

30-08-2023

Registration No

215/2023

Registration Date

30-08-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1
IA/4/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section K.NAKULSAMY AND 2 OTHERSS.CHELLAMMAL

Petitioner(s)

S.CHELLAMMAL

Adv. R.MANIVEL

Respondent(s)

K.NAKULSAMY AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - T.RAVIKUMAR

N.POORNIMA @ SUDHA

K.VINOGA

Adv. T.RAVIKUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

07-04-2026

Judgement

26-03-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Arguments

16-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

02-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

This is a Tamil-language civil case (A.V. No. 215/2023) from Karur District Court dated 02.03.2026 involving a property partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding an oral partition of agricultural land (3.31 acres originally, with 6 acres purchased in 2001) and found the witness's claims of oral partition and the first defendant's conduct regarding the plaintiff's daughters' marriages to be unsubstantiated. The court recorded that no valid written partition occurred and rejected the witness's testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil-language civil case (A.V. No. 215/2023) from Karur District Court dated 02.03.2026 involving a property partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding an oral partition of agricultural land (3.31 acres originally, with 6 acres purchased in 2001) and found the witness's claims of oral partition and the first defendant's conduct regarding the plaintiff's daughters' marriages to be unsubstantiated. The court recorded that no valid written partition occurred and rejected the witness's testimony as unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Karur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case