S.MAHIZHMARAN vs S.THAMARAISELVAN Advocate - M.KALAISELVAN — 212/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed without cost on 10th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR010026422023
Filing Number
898/2023
Filing Date
29-Aug-2023
Registration No
212/2023
Registration Date
29-Aug-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Karur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed without cost
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.MAHIZHMARAN
Adv. S.SUDHAKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.THAMARAISELVAN Advocate - M.KALAISELVAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that B.G. Srinivasan died intestate (not validly by will, as the defendant failed to prove the alleged 1998 will per Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act). Consequently, the property devolved among five legal heirs equally; after three heirs relinquished their shares to the plaintiff, he is entitled to 4/5 share while the defendant retains 1/5 share. The court passed a preliminary decree for partition and directed the plaintiff to file for a final decree within 2 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Judgement
District Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
List / Special List
District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
List / Special List
District Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
List / Special List
District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Trial
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Issues
District Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Issues
District Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
19-Jun-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
10-Apr-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
IA Pending
District Judge
-
13-Feb-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Judge
-
19-Dec-2023
Written Statement
District Judge
-
28-Nov-2023
Written Statement
District Judge
-
31-Oct-2023
Written Statement
District Judge
-
27-Sep-2023
Written Statement
District Judge
-
29-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 212/2023
The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that B.G. Srinivasan died intestate (not validly by will, as the defendant failed to prove the alleged 1998 will per Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act). Consequently, the property devolved among five legal heirs equally; after three heirs relinquished their shares to the plaintiff, he is entitled to 4/5 share while the defendant retains 1/5 share. The court passed a preliminary decree for partition and directed the plaintiff to file for a final decree within 2 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts